![]() The Notes section of the PPT can be imported as captions to support WGEA accessibility. Camtasia can be used straight from a PPT ribbon add-in. It’s purpose built software, easy to use, relatively inexpensive and well supported by the company, Techsmith. Option 2: Video production using PowerPoint (PPT) Option 1: Video production using a smartphone camera or camcorderĮxamples uses include vox-pops, monologues from experts, Q&A interviews and capturing repeatable skills and other manual processes. There are other cost-effective production options that can add value to training, as long as principles of tight scripting and visual interest are maintained. However, training budgets don’t always have the budget for high-end production videos. Once you get to know their strengths and weaknesses, it really is hard to imagine living without either one.Video is a very powerful medium for learning, as described in our E-Learning Academy YouTube Channel playlist: Video for Organisational Learning.Ī well scripted and camera shot video is very powerful for distributing corporate messages and training staff on concepts and processes. If you’re new to the Flash/Director/Captivate interface paradigm, you’ll find Tom Green’s Visual QuickStart Guide to Macromedia Captivate (Peachpit Press) a life saver.Īs we said at the outset, each program has killer features that may swing the pendulum in its favor, but more likely will make both tools essential for many presenters. We will say that the Captivate manual was very disappointing, with no screens and very little contextual information. On the other hand, with training and simulation, Captivate is more capable and easier to use, particularly the ability to preview Click Boxes and other user input in near-real time. So for all but the most complex software demonstrations, we prefer Camtasia. Captivate is a tool you might use to paint the Sistine Chapel, when time and money was no object, but you wouldn’t use it to paint your living room, even if your spouse were watching-it would simply take too long. So how do the tools stack up? Overall, Captivate’s precision is both its greatest strength and biggest weakness. Captivate can also create a standalone Flash executable for playback, as well as publish a movie to a Breeze server. Captivate creates only one SWF file, however, which is even easier to integrate or send via email. Fortunately, Camtasia creates the HTML file necessary to meld the two, so it’s easy to integrate them on a Web site. One irritation is that Camtasia builds the movie controls and the content into separate SWF files, so you can’t simply send a single SWF file for remote viewing. Interestingly, in our tests, the SWF files created by Camtasia were almost identical in size to those created in Captivate, though these examples involved no real-time capture of streaming or other video. Speaking of encoding, we also liked the range of output formats that Camtasia offered, which included H.264, Windows Media, AVI, SWF, and FLV, a nice contrast to Captivate’s "any flavor you want so long as it’s Flash" option. ![]() Then you can publish your presentation on online or on CD/DVD literally in the time it takes encode the file.įigure 6 (below): Camtasia’s PowerPoint plug-in, shown on the upper left, makes it incredibly easy to record your PowerPoint presentations in real time. With Camtasia, there’s no reason not to record every live PowerPoint presentation, since you can edit the audio and video later if necessary. Though Captivate can import PowerPoint slides and let you add narration, there is no live recording feature. Then we integrated the two using Camtasia’s new picture-in-picture feature. ![]() For example, in our tests, we recorded a PowerPoint presentation, using Logitech’s OrbitMP QuickCAM to capture the audio and a video window. ![]() Plug a microphone into your computer while you make your presentation and you can record your comments in real time, even adding a video feed of the speaker if desired. Review: Adobe Captivate and TechSmith Camtasia StudioĬamtasia’s PowerPoint operation ( Figure 6) is also superior to Captivate’s. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |